I believe the Democrats should go with a weasel or a chicken for their mascot. Both animals sum up the Democratic mentality nicely. The Republicans, on the other hand, would do well with Napoleon the Pig (from Orwell’s Animal Farm) or the Democrat’s own donkey.
In the latest example of our inability to deal with current issues, our illustrious congress has attempted to put a mandatory pull out date for our operations in Iraq in an appropriations bill that is supposed to fund our efforts there. Whether you’re in favor of our current deployment in Iraq or not, our country has a responsibility to finish what we started. To pull out now, based on a time table that is politically expedient, is unfair to the people of Iraq. It is also unfair to those American men and women who have lost their lives to achieve the objectives of our government. Providing a mandatory pull out date is tantamout to pissing on the graves of our sons and daughters, brother and sisters, fathers and mothers. The Democratic party is sending a clear message that the sacrifices that have already been made have achieved nothing. They can couch it in terms of “we’re saving the lives of future soldiers,” but the reality is that they want to win elections. By politicizing the future of Iraq, they gain seats in congress and time in the limelight of our sensationalist media.
The Republicans, on the other hand, are just as guilty. They used a paper thin excuse to convince the American people that they were making the world safe from terrorism. Had President Bush come on my television and told us the following: “Folks…we’re going after the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan as best we know how. However, it is in the interests of America that we extend our fight to Iraq, Syria, Palestine, Lebanon, and Sudan in order to secure the world for Western interests. This means an increase in military spending and deployment, but will ultimately make the price for attacking America so high that terrorist organizations around the world will understand that to do so means signing their own death warrant.” I would have no problem with this kind of honest, naked imperialism. Instead, we were lied to, or at best, misled about the facts on the ground in Iraq. It was a truly noble calling for us to free the people of Iraq, but to do so under the guise of searching for WMD’s or crushing terrorist organizations is a lie.
And now, despite the fact that the American people were misled, we have a responsibility to finish what we’ve started. An election year doesn’t suddenly absolve the body politic from discharing its responsibilities. We owe the people of Iraq and the Middle East a chance to see a stable and secure nation state. Suddenly withdrawing our support by sacrificing an entire country’s future on the altar of political expediency is reprehensible and cowardly. We, as a nation, are better than that. We have a history of individualism and self-determination, but this has always been tempered with a sense of duty and justice. If we abandon the people of Iraq in their hour of need, then we, as citizens, share the blame for every man, woman, and child who dies as a result of the ensuing anarchy and instability.
It is time our leadership realized this.
Pete on March 27th 2007 in Politics