Archive for December, 2007

Tom Kratman’s A Desert Called Peace

What a way to start the New Year!

I received several good reads for Christmas, and my recent trend of slacking off in the reading department is no longer acceptable with all of the reading goodness arrayed before me.

I’ve started with Tom Kratman’s A Desert Called Peace. Kratman is currently in the Baen stable of authors, which means that there is a certain amount of baggage associated with the book.  Baen authors tend to write in a fairly uniform style (the exception being Eric Flint, who seems hard pressed to find a style), and their political leanings seem to be either strongly libertarian or right-of-center. Kratman is no exception to this; his novel of the future is depressingly like the events of today, including an attack by Islamic fundamentalists on an edifice of trade and commerce similar to the WTC.

Instead of history following its course as it has today, Kratman posits the existence of a capable, retired military officer in the mould of Belisarius or Julius Caesar who feels a burning hatred toward the world of Islam. The novel follows a Heart of Darkness style journey to the depths of this officer’s soul as he embarks on a course of annhiliation. That this book even contemplates such a course is disturbing to a reader with voyeuristic tendencies; that his message resonates so well not only with me, but with a sizable portion of the sci-fi community is frightening. I find it ironic that the post I made in the wake of Bhutto’s death is so germane to this novel. My hat is off to Kratman…I don’t think I would have the guts to go where he’s going with this series, but I’ll certainly keep reading.

3 Comments »

Pete on December 31st 2007 in Book Reviews

Television/Film Presentation of the Year Poll

[poll=5]

4 Comments »

Pete on December 30th 2007 in Television, DVD, and Film Reviews

Television/Film Presentation of the Year Nominees

The nominees are:

  • Heroes - A bona fide cultural phenomenon, Heroes began to disappoint midway through the fall, recovering nicely by tying up some backstory, introducing a new villain, and ending on a cliff-hanger. Tim Kring says that the latter half of season two will return the story to its roots as well as providing more action and more screen time from favorite characters.
  • Battlestar Galactica Season 3 / Razor - This is hands-down the most under rated show on television. Placed in a bad time slot on a network known for camp (the Sci-Fi Channel), not many people outside of the SF community have an opportunity to watch the the high-quality drama that just happens to be set in a science fiction milieu. There is tension, social relevance, and great writing in equal amounts. Not since Aaron Sorkin’s presence on network TV has an episodic series been this consistently great.
  • 300 - Frank Miller’s graphic novel was turned into a brutal and desperate masterpiece that captures the virtues of being a soldier. It is a cautionary tale for modern times about the wages of corruption and inaction in the face of a clear and present danger. Gerard Butler is intense and likeable as King Leonidas of Sparta, turning in a better performance here than he did in Joel Schumaker’s remake of The Phantom of the Opera.
  • Transformers - This made the list sheerly out of my boyish love for mayhem, hot girls, and a fairly moving story about a race of machines continuing their apocalypse on Earth. There is nothing here outstanding about the acting or the plot, but the special effects are hands down the best I’ve seen in a movie. Michael Bay wins bonus points for recasting the original Optimus Prime from the cartoon Transformers as the voice of the CG-driven doppelganger. This is one of the few must-see movies of the year.
  • The Bourne Ultimatum - Each Bourne movie kept getting better. These are intelligent espionage thrillers that leave me wishing that James Bond could have a little of Bourne’s ruthlessness. The global cat and mouse game moves across Europe, into North Africa, until there is a final showdown in New York City. There are no real surprises here, but the action is incredible, and Matt Damon once again proves his chops as the best spy/assassin in the world.
  • Charlie Wilson’s War - I didn’t have a chance to give this a review what with the busy time I’ve had this holiday. Tom Hanks deserves another academy award nod for his portrayal of a partying Texas congressman who moves behind the scenes to provide money for arms in Afghanistan. Julia Roberts delivers a lackluster performance as a God-fearing southern belle, but Phillip Seymour Hoffman plays an over the hill CIA analyst to perfection. Written by Aaron Sorkin, this movie has the quick dialogue and quirky humor that his television series are known for, but he is much more free to be himself outside of a network television environment.

Probably my call for the worst movie of the year would be the third Pirates of the Caribbean. I’ve never walked out of a movie so disappointed (although the third Matrix movie was close). This was a travesty of plot that ruined strong characters in an effort to provide as much mayhem as possible on the screen. Bruckheimer spent over 200 million dollars and he still failed to impress me. Go figure.

No Comments »

Pete on December 30th 2007 in Television, DVD, and Film Reviews

Quick Hits

No Comments »

Pete on December 29th 2007 in Politics, Theology/Philosophy

Peace and Islam - The Biggest Con Job in History

If you haven’t heard already, Benazir Bhutto is dead.

She is a former Prime Minister of Pakistan, scion of a family known for leadership in that country’s government, and until recently, had been living in exile due to charges of corruption from the military and former political figures.

She was shot twice, once in the head, once in the chest, before a suicide bomber got close enough to blow himself up, along with her car, her entourage, and a few members of the crowd surrounding her. You can couch her assassination in whatever terms you’d like, but the fact is that she was a woman leader of a predominantly Islamic country. She is friendly with the West, progressive on the human rights front, and a proponent of democracy. In short, she is everything that conservative Islam deplores.

I have gone back and forth in my thought process. Shortly after 9/11, I believed that every government known to harbor terrorists should have been purged from the face of the planet. I include Sudan, Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, the PLO, and Yemen. Other governments that have active terror campaigns in their countries, such as Indonesia, the Phillipines, Pakistan, India, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia should have been put on notice. Stop it now or the U.S. will, and damn the consequences. Such a stance is dangerous and provides the catalyst for a global war that courts nuclear annihilation, so after I cooled down a bit, I could see our measured response in Afghanistan (Iraq is a different kettle of fish).

After a while, I began to think of people in the Middle East as just “plain folks.” They don’t blindly follow their leadership any more than we in the West do. Most want to be left alone, to raise their families, and turn a profit in whatever business they’re involved in. I began to gave the bulk of the population there the benefit of the doubt.

After I became comfortable with this attitude, something like this happens. Any society, in any corner of the globe, has the responsibility to police itself and protect the people in that society from harm. When this is no longer possible, you have a breakdown in that society that becomes the breeding ground for extremism, civil war, and terrorism. In the Middle East, this degradation is done in the name of Allah, to take revenge on us for our success and our wealth. You can blame it on colonialism (popular in Europe), you can blame it on religious differences, but the fundamental reason why we are hated so much is that we are free, we are wealthy, and we are seeking to make the world in our image.

The last part is really the sticking point. I don’t know that any of your average Americans would put it so bluntly: “I want to export our culture of equality, democracy, and materialism to the rest of the world so that an open market becomes a check against future warfare.” Often I think that most practitioners of Islam who are not familiar with our country think we’re out to convert them. Most of us could care less who/what they worship. We just want to buy their oil and sell them luxury goods and technology. Everyone wins in our scenario.

Time and again, through the past one thousand years, it has been conclusively demonstrated that the core of Islam is rooted in violence. While the West has managed to overcome our violent pasts and move toward peace and diplomacy, increased standards of living, and freedom, this transition escapes the people of the Islamic crescent. Their people choose to remain ignorant and choose to allow the violence and evil of their forefathers to gain a foothold in their progeny. The sooner the West realizes this, the sooner we recognize that we have a new Cold War of ideology brewing in a part of the world that is essential for our infrastructure.

Once again, I am moved to a solution that contemplates annihilation. It is only a matter of time before some radical manages to obtain a WMD (biological, chemical, or nuclear) and release it on U.S. soil. It is my profound hope that we wake up to the threat that this poses and take the necessary steps to secure our future before the choice is taken from us by a radical with visions of virgins dancing in his head.

If we don’t have the stomach to do what is necessary, then I fear we will end up on the scrap heap of history. Islam collectively are the Goths to our Rome. I pray it doesn’t come to a dark age before we realize it.

9 Comments »

Pete on December 27th 2007 in Politics, Theology/Philosophy

The O’Leary Letters

In an effort to follow the advice of both my agent and some editorial comments that I received, I’ve asked Kate to do a special series of pieces that are set in the universe of my novel Loss of Innocence. If you recall from our initial writing sample/podcast days, this was the story of Michael Collins, as he learned what it meant to be a soldier and a leader of men in the face of conflict with an extra-terrestrial invader. A main character in this story was Shannon O’Leary, a fellow soldier and Collins’ chief love interest. Their rocky relationship provided an anchor for both of them to weather the demands placed on them by serving their planet.

In the original draft, O’Leary perished during a large action set-piece. Her sacrifice allowed Collins to escape and resolved some tension between the two characters on a personal and professional level. However, this sort of took the easy way out. Since a remarkable number of women now read genre fiction (some surveys place it as high as 60% for science fiction), it made sense to re-write this set piece so that O’Leary made it through. This also allowed Collins to explore a side of himself that he intentionally suppressed while in combat.

This series of pieces provides a female perspective to the war and gives readers a unique insight into O’Leary’s character. It also provides an alternative narrative voice to a novel written in first person (from Collins’ PoV). I can’t say enough how thrilled I am with the work that Kate has done thus far on these short pieces. Her empathy and her flair for the emotional serve as an essential corollary to the story of an Earth under siege.

With no further ado, I give you Letters Home.

Letters Home  - set in the universe of A Loss of Innocence
Universe by Peter Hodges
Story by Kate Baker
Dramatic Reading by Kate Baker
Music: “Valerie” from the V for Vendetta Soundtrack

 
icon for podpress  Standard Podcast: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

1 Comment »

Pete on December 26th 2007 in Random Ramblings

TF2 Griefing - Part Deux

Again, this is only funny because I wasn’t on the server…although the trivia thing looks pretty hilarious.

No Comments »

Pete on December 24th 2007 in Video Games