“It was all part of the plan.”

The Dark Knight is the best movie of the summer.

I went in expecting it to be a bit of a letdown given the sheer amount of hype surrounding the film. After reading countless reviews about Heath Ledger’s brilliance and the the quality of the movie, I felt that too many in the entertainment business were paying posthumous homage to a departed actor.

I was wrong.

Forget Jack Nicholson. Forget Tim Burton. Forget Michael Keaton. This iteration of the Batman story is vital, realistic, and visceral. The action, the acting, and the struggles in the film hit you at a level below the conscious. In the course of the movie, viewers are forced to contend with many of the social issues of today. The film doesn’t shy away from them, instead preferring to confront them head on. Remarkably, they arrive at an answer that I not only agreed with, but also found compelling.

The Joker embodies the ultimate agent of chaos. When literally confronted with a pile of money, he remarks to a group of mobsters that he’d rather have dynamite and gasoline. That says everything about his personality. He’s not interested in material wealth. He’s playing the game for the sake of it. He doesn’t want to ultimately win, and he doesn’t necessarily want to lose. He just wants to keep playing as long as he can.

Harvey Dent, the district attorney of Gotham, provides a memorable subplot as the eventual Two Face. First characterized as Gotham’s “White Knight” (an obvious foil to Bruce Wayne’s “Dark Knight”), he uses both Lieutenant Gordon and Batman to drive his fight against crime to nearly the end. It is his purity of character and the nature of his crusade that ultimate makes him attractive to the Joker. The Joker doesn’t want to discredit him so that crime can flourish in Gotham again, he wants to discredit him because he is the embodiment of Gotham’s best virtues. Dent has succeeded in being the hero that Bruce Wayne can only dream about becoming. He works in the open using the system, and has met a large degree of success.

As anyone familiar with Batman knows, Dent’s eventual transformation to Two Face is inevitable. The events that drive him to it are rooted firmly in pop psychology, but the bit about flipping a coin to determine fate was a little overdone in a movie that lacked traditional gimmickry. It felt slightly out of place given the larger scope of the story, but I can forgive Director Christopher Nolan for throwing this bone to the legions of loyal “purists.” The results of his transformation are gruesome, skirting closely to the edge of an “R” rating. 

If Katie Holmes was miscast as Rachel Dawes, then Maggie Gyllenhall isn’t much better. She seems more confident and less girl-next-door. She wears a sort of sultry sensuality under her good girl exterior (which Katie Holmes lacked), but she still isn’t believable as a crusading assistant district attorney. Her role is sorely under-utilized in the movie, but with a running time of two and a half hours and several large action set pieces, perhaps the writers can be forgiven for not developing her character further.

The ending is bittersweet, but Batman has always struggled with the cost of being the symbol of justice for Gotham City. There is a nice set up for the sequel in the last ten minutes of the movie. My speculation is that the next movie might prove to be even darker and more grim than this one.

The comic book or superhero genres are typically rife with unbelievable acts that rarely have real-world consequences. The Dark Knight has elevated itself above genre conventions and firmly into the role of serious drama. At no single point did the dreaded “Oh, come on!” escape my lips. Whether this is a testament to Nolan’s skill as a filmmaker or my own infatuation with the story and characters will have to wait on a second viewing.

Pete on July 20th 2008 in Television, DVD, and Film Reviews

8 Responses to ““It was all part of the plan.””

  1. Books and Magazines Blog » Archive » “It was all part of the plan.” responded on 20 Jul 2008 at 3:17 pm #

    [...] Original post by Peter Hodges [...]

  2. Mr. Chris responded on 21 Jul 2008 at 5:36 am #

    I’m waiting until this weekend so I can work my way into an IMAX showing. 20 minutes of IMAX formatted film to give the outdoor shots even more kick. Gimicky? Sure, but I’ll play.

    Any guesses which villains will show in the third?

  3. Pete responded on 21 Jul 2008 at 7:49 am #

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_villains

    That page illustrates why I don’t spend too much time in comics.

    My hope is that they find someone of the Joker’s caliber, or that they bring the Joker back with another actor.

    I don’t know that I could take the Penguin or Catwoman in the universe that Nolan has created.

  4. Mr. Chris responded on 21 Jul 2008 at 8:46 am #

    I hope Nolan understands the appeal the plausibility the new series carries. I’d rather he steer clear of “fantastic” super-villains like Poison Ivy, Killer Croc, Man Bat, Mr. Freeze and Clayface.

    I can imagine a few directions Nolan could take Catwoman or Oswald Cobblepot that could help the characters shed their camp-factor and fit into this new Gotham. I think Riddler could easily be re-spun to fit Nolan’s films.

    The tone and goals of Nolan’s films embody what nearly all geeks have wanted for so long. Even as I suggest villains, I cringe at the risk of introducing “camp” into the series. Ironically, that’s part of the charm–retooling the familiar so we get the grit without the cheese.

    Scarecrow was my dream villain. I had yearned for an R-rated showdown with Scarecrow since Tim Burton’s debut Batman film. (…and Nolan does fine with his PG-13 version.)

  5. Dez responded on 21 Jul 2008 at 2:25 pm #

    I see any villain showdown (other than The Joker) after this movie as being anti-climactic. No one villain can match the Joker for terror or evil. Should there be a sequel, it had better be well written and delivered. It’s hard for me to imagine The Penguin or the Riddler in a story as compelling as the current one or drawing large interested crowds.

    All of Batman’s major foes, save one, are psychological foils of Wayne or Batman; and there are decades of story material to reveal. So the ground is fertile. I hope that the writers/directors are up to the task… but I don’t believe this current movie will ever be outdone.

    In this movie I have already seen an homage to Frank Miller, not just in the movie’s title, but also among the rogues. It’s far too early (in this series) to see a screen adaptation of Miller’s vision of Batman… unless done as a huge flash-forward… but I’d love to see such a movie.

  6. badfun responded on 21 Jul 2008 at 6:19 pm #

    I plan on seeing it Wednesday!

  7. Kate responded on 22 Jul 2008 at 12:27 pm #

    There have been very few actors who have made me feel uncomfortable while watching them. Namely, Denzel Washington in Training Day and Anthony Hopkins in Silence of the Lambs .

    I was genuinely uneasy and sometimes terrified of the Joker.

    If you haven’t seen this movie, what the hell are you waiting for?

  8. durmiun/jason responded on 22 Jul 2008 at 6:18 pm #

    I want to see it. As for what I’m waiting for.. Money, and to see if I get into the GSP program through DeVry. I’ll take my girl out to celebrate in that event :-P

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply