The Trouble with Tribbles…

The trouble with die-hard Star Trek fans is that they are blinded by their own prejuidices. 

(That’s certainly a bold way to open a post, isn’t it?) In speaking with several of my friends and acquaintances who are Trek rabid, one thing has become abundantly clear–no one can agree whether or not J.J. Abrams is raping an effigy of William Shatner or if he’s the long-awaited Trek Messiah.

Let’s be candid about Star Trek for a moment. The last feature length film was mediocre. The one before that had a script barely worth of an episode on television. You have to go all the way back to Star Trek: First Contact to get a story worth of the Trek franchise. The last series, Enterprise, didn’t have the chemistry that previous shows had. Only two people that I know of took Star Trek: Voyager seriously. As far as the mainstream is concerned, that leaves the intellectual property of Star Trek broken and bleeding on the floor.

Enter J.J. Abrams.

Abrams is the director of choice to reach people like me. I watched the old show in syndicated re-runs growing up at every opportunity, buying Kirk’s cheesy lines hook, line, and sinker. When Star Trek: TNG came out, I watched it religiously. I overlooked the annoyances perpetuated by Brent Spiner (Data) and lived for the storylines that involved Picard. (As a teenager, I had a debate with my friend about who I’d rather sleep with: Dr. Crusher or DeAnna Troi? There’s really only one right answer here.)

When Deep Space Nine came out, I stumbled through the first season until they got rolling in the Dominion War, and eagerly awaited the resolution. I didn’t even mind when they jumped the shark and brought Worf onto the show. Then I moved on to Bablyon 5, Firefly, and most recently, Battlestar Galactica. Trek died for me the day DS9 went off the air.

Most of the Star Trek faithful can’t see past the spectacle visible in the trailers. They think their beloved show has been perverted by big budget set pieces and liberties with the canon. In the trailer, Kirk, who was always somewhat of a rogue, is shown to be openly rebellious, channeling Gen X angst in high stakes fight scenes. I’ve heard the laundry list of complaints: “He’s too young.” “Kirk and Spock would never fight on the bridge.” “The Enterprise was built in space.” My answers: Maybe. Yeah, but it sure looks cool. So what?

For those of the semi-loyal fandom, Abrams is perfect because he has proven his geek cred with his television serials. He also took a risk with Cloverfield, and it paid off in spades. He has a talent for writing/shooting action scenes, which makes him somewhat of a rare breed for the Star Trek universe. Given the limited production information available online, I’m willing to do more than give him the benefit of the doubt.

Why am I willing to give Abrams the benefit of the doubt? It’s simple–look at the trailer. He’s taking the franchise places where no one has gone before. The universe seems more…human. The action is more intense, the special effects are the best that a Trek movie has ever had, and the characters are no longer archetypes built out of hope in a cold-war era world. I’m not saying I’m going to run out and learn Klingon, but you can color me excited for the late Spring release.

See for yourself:

This entry was posted in Television, DVD, and Film Reviews. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to The Trouble with Tribbles…

  1. Dez says:

    I’ve seen everything that the Star Trek universe has thrown at us… TOS, TNG, DS9, Voyager (urk… excuse me, I threw up), Enterprise, the movies, and the animated series. Apart from ST2: The Wrath of Mom, I’ve generally felt cheated of my hard-earned money and 2 hours of my life after watching a ST movie. However, I am looking forward to this new movie, if only to see another director’s take on the character dynamics between Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. The characters made the show for me, so I’m hoping this new flick isn’t shallow in that area. I also hope that the story has merit and isn’t buried by the Special FX. I’ll withhold judgment at least until after I’ve seen this release.

  2. Foxbat says:

    Perhaps I misremembered it, but I believe awhile back (when they first started releasing pages and clips and what not…), you were not so positively inclined about the new Star Trek Movie. Did you not scoff at them building the ship on a planet? (a small nit, I agree…)

    I firmly believe one must do with the new Star Trek as one has with the new Battlestar Galactica and that’s separate the past knowledge and judge it on it’s own merits.

    I generally agree with the ‘every even numbered movie was worth watching, and every odd numbered movie was theft from my wallet’, although the last movie left glaring plot holes that even I had issues with.

    Star Trek and Watchmen are the movies currently on my radar. I’ll see them when they come out and see if they stand up to my generally low expectations.

  3. Vince says:

    As a long-time Trk fan, th various series have had their ups and downs, and like you, I wasn’t a Voyager or Enterprise fan. I suspect that, like all good series(or in this case, multiple series), there comes a time when the energy and ideas and writing is worn out, and it’s time to move on.

    I’m looking forward to seeing the reboot, as I’m interested in what Abrams take will be. I appreciate good special effects, but what I’m hoping to see is a good story and character interaction. I’m not an Abrams fanboy, but I enjoy enough of what he’s done to be optimistic.

  4. badfun says:

    lost=meh cloverfeild=not bad. This could be a good flick. I liked ST STNG and Ds9 I didn’t find the other shows worth watching, since I had fraggin to do!

  5. badfun says:

    Fringe is the new JJ abrams show it like a xfile rip off.You can watch it free on Fox.com I watched a few.

  6. Foxbat says:

    Fringe is X-Files on crack. The crackpot ‘mad scientist’ character is by far the best feature of the show…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>